Ophiuchus, the 13th zodiac sign: no, your sign has not changed
Ophiuchus is a constellation, not a sign. Constellations vs signs, precession, the NASA rumour: why your zodiac sign has not changed, with the real figures.

Straight answer · Diagram · Computed figures
Every two or three years the same headline does the rounds: “NASA has added a thirteenth sign, Ophiuchus, and your sign has changed.” Nothing has changed. Ophiuchus is a constellation, a figure of stars; a sign is a 30° sector of the solar year. They are not two versions of the same thing.
This article explains the difference with a diagram, gives the real dates of the Sun in front of each constellation, computed with the official boundaries, tells why the rumour keeps coming back, and what the serpent bearer is really doing in the sky.
Sun in front of Ophiuchus
18 days a year
Sun in front of Scorpius
Six and a half days
Shift between signs and constellations
About 24°
The short answer
Your sign has not changed, and there is no 13th zodiac sign. The signs are twelve equal sectors counted from the spring equinox: Aries begins on the day spring begins, whatever stars sit behind the Sun. Ophiuchus is a constellation the Sun crosses from 30 November to 18 December, and it has done so since antiquity: the Greek astrologers knew it and counted twelve signs all the same. NASA decided nothing, added nothing, and said so in writing.
Key points
- A sign is a 30° sector of the ecliptic counted from the equinox; a constellation is a group of stars with boundaries drawn by astronomers in 1930. Same names, different objects.
- The Sun crosses thirteen constellations of very unequal size: 44 days in front of Virgo, 18 in front of Ophiuchus, six and a half in front of Scorpius.
- The constellations have slipped by about 24° relative to the signs since antiquity: that is precession, known since Hipparchus and already built in by Ptolemy.
- The “new zodiac” rumour comes from a NASA page for children (2016), recycled every slow news summer. NASA denied it in 2016 and in 2020.
- Born between 30 November and 18 December? You are a Sagittarius, as you were yesterday.
Contents
Constellation and sign: two different things
A constellation is a pattern of stars, with official borders drawn by the International Astronomical Union in 1930. A zodiac sign is one twelfth of the ecliptic, the Sun’s apparent path through the year, counted from the point where the Sun stands at the spring equinox. The first is a map of the sky; the second is a calendar.
They share their names because, twenty-five centuries ago, the sectors of the calendar were christened after the constellations they roughly covered. The diagram below puts the two rows one under the other, to the same scale. Top: twelve equal boxes. Bottom: thirteen boxes of any size, shifted to the right: the constellation borders, translated into degrees along the ecliptic.
Read it this way: the sign Scorpio measures 30°, the constellation Scorpius 6.6°. The sign Virgo measures 30°, the constellation 44°. No box in the bottom row coincides with a box in the top row. If signs were constellations, astrology would have six-day signs and forty-five-day signs. It never has, because it has never counted stars: it counts seasons.
Thirteen constellations, and always have been
The Sun passes in front of thirteen constellations, not twelve, and that is no discovery: Ptolemy, in the second century, already catalogued Ophiuchus, whose foot dips into the ecliptic, and he counted twelve signs all the same. What the 1930 boundaries added is precision: we can now say, to the day, how long the Sun spends in front of each one.
I ran that calculation for 2026 with the official boundaries and an ephemeris. The dates are those of the Sun’s entry into each constellation, UK time; they drift by about a day per century, so they hold for anyone alive today. The last column gives the sign, the real one, for the same dates.
The Sun in front of the constellations of the ecliptic in 2026
| Constellation | Sun enters | Days | Actual sign |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capricornus | 20 January | 27.4 | Aquarius |
| Aquarius | 16 February | 24.1 | Aquarius, Pisces |
| Pisces | 12 March | 37.5 | Pisces, Aries |
| Aries | 19 April | 25.5 | Aries, Taurus |
| Taurus | 14 May | 38.3 | Taurus, Gemini, Cancer |
| Gemini | 21 June | 29.2 | Cancer |
| Cancer | 21 July | 21.0 | Cancer, Leo |
| Leo | 11 August | 37.0 | Leo, Virgo |
| Virgo | 17 September | 44.5 | Virgo, Libra, Scorpio |
| Libra | 31 October | 23.1 | Scorpio, Sagittarius |
| Scorpius | 23 November | 6.5 | Sagittarius |
| Ophiuchus | 30 November | 18.3 | Sagittarius |
| Sagittarius | 18 December | 32.8 | Sagittarius, Capricorn |
Three rows are enough to sink the idea of a thirteen-sign zodiac: Scorpius six and a half days, Ophiuchus eighteen, Virgo forty-four. A zodiac built on the constellations would not give thirteen signs; it would give thirteen periods of six to forty-five days, redrawn every century. The articles announcing Ophiuchus “from 29 November to 17 December” are copying this astronomical calculation while believing they are talking about astrology.
Why the sky has slipped: precession
The Earth’s axis slowly turns on itself, like that of a spinning top, and completes a full circle in about 25,800 years. The point of the spring equinox therefore moves backwards along the ecliptic by one degree every 72 years. This is the precession of the equinoxes, measured by Hipparchus in the second century BC. Since the time the signs received their names, the gap has reached about 24°, almost a whole sign.
That is the second half of the rumour: not only are the constellations unequal, they are no longer “opposite” the signs. The vernal point, 0° Aries, entered the constellation Pisces around 67 BC, by the 1930 boundaries, and will enter Aquarius in 2597. It has never stopped being called 0° Aries, because that name marks the start of spring, not a star.
Tropical, sidereal: two conventions, twelve signs in both
Western astrology is tropical: its signs follow the seasons, and Ptolemy explicitly sets their origin at the equinox. Indian astrology is sidereal: it counts from a reference star and corrects the gap, called the ayanamsa, which stands at 24° 14′ in 2026 in its most widely used version. A tropical Sagittarius born in early December is therefore a sidereal Scorpio. That disagreement is old, serious and interesting. But it concerns where the count starts, not how it is divided: both schools have twelve equal signs of 30°, and neither has ever counted Ophiuchus.
It separates signs from constellations for good. Tropical astrology has owned that choice for nineteen centuries: Aries is the sign of spring’s first push, Cancer the sign of the summer solstice, whatever stars drift behind. The pages on the decans and on dominant signs start from that definition.
Where the rumour comes from, and why it returns
The story of the “thirteenth sign” is fifty years old and has three authors. None of them is NASA. What the agency published, in 2016, is a children’s astronomy page explaining the thirteen constellations and precession. A magazine turned it into “NASA changed your sign”. Since then, the same page resurfaces at every lull in the news.
| When | What happened |
|---|---|
| 1970 | Stephen Schmidt publishes Astrology 14: a fourteen-sign zodiac with Ophiuchus and Cetus the Whale. Nobody follows. |
| 1995 | Walter Berg, The 13 Signs of the Zodiac: Ophiuchus is given a “personality”. Every trait list you still read today comes from here. |
| January 2011 | Parke Kunkle, an astronomer at the Minnesota Planetarium Society, reminds a local paper of precession. First worldwide wave. |
| 2016 | A NASA page for children explains the thirteen constellations. A magazine headlines “NASA changed your sign”. NASA replies: “we didn’t change any zodiac signs, we just did the math”. |
| July 2020 | Same page, same headline, new wave. NASA tweets: “No, we did not change the zodiac”. |
| 2025-2026 | The story runs again through Latin America in December, then through the Belgian and French press in June. With no new information. |
Why does it come back? Because every ingredient of a viral story is there: a scientific authority misquoted, a surprise that touches identity (“I’m not a Leo any more?”), a table of dates to share, and a rebuttal that takes three paragraphs where the claim fits in a headline. Each new wave is written by people who do not remember the last one. This article is here for the next.
Asclepius, the serpent bearer
Ophiuchus deserves better than to be a rumour. To the Greeks he is Asclepius, son of Apollo and the mortal Coronis, raised by the centaur Chiron, who teaches him the art of healing. He becomes so good at it that he brings the dead back to life. Hades complains, Zeus strikes the healer down with a thunderbolt, then sets him among the stars with a serpent in his hands. Eratosthenes and Hyginus tell the story; the rod of Asclepius, with its coiled serpent, is still the emblem of medicine.
Mythology was my way into astrology, at the age of ten: behind every god a planet, behind every planet a way of being. Asclepius taught me early where that game stops. He has no planet. He has no season. He holds in the sky a constellation in two pieces, Serpens, the only one in the catalogue cut in half by another, and that is already a lot. A sign, no: signs are not heroes placed in the sky, they are the twelve times of the year.
The “Ophiuchus traits” you read in the articles, healer, seeker of truth, lucky, jealous, were written in 1995 by Walter Berg for his book. They have no earlier source, no tradition behind them, and no astrologer who calculates charts uses them. What astrology does with the myth of Asclepius, it does elsewhere: in the medical tradition, in Virgo and the sixth house, and in Chiron, the master who trained him.
Born between 30 November and 18 December?
You are a Sagittarius, like everyone born on those dates since the zodiac has existed. The Sun really is in front of the stars of Ophiuchus on those days, which is a lovely thing to know and has no effect on your chart. What can still change your sign is a different question altogether: being born on the exact day the Sun moves from Scorpio into Sagittarius, around 22 November, at a time that differs every year.
If you were born on the boundary between two signs, the article on being born on the cusp includes a checker that gives the exact crossing time for your year and your country of birth. That is the only situation in which a sign “changes”, and it is settled to the minute, not with a new zodiac.
Frequently asked questions about Ophiuchus and the 13th sign
Is Ophiuchus a zodiac sign?
No. Ophiuchus, the Serpent Bearer, is a constellation: a group of stars with boundaries fixed by astronomers in 1930. A sign is a 30° sector of the ecliptic counted from the spring equinox, with no connection to the stars behind it. The twelve signs share the 360°; there is no room for a thirteenth, and no astrological tradition has ever counted one.
Did NASA change the zodiac signs?
No, and it has said so twice. In 2016, after a magazine article, NASA wrote that it studies astronomy, not astrology, that it had not changed any sign and had only restated a calculation: the Sun crosses thirteen constellations of unequal size. In July 2020 it tweeted: “No, we did not change the zodiac”.
What are the Ophiuchus dates?
The Sun passes in front of the constellation Ophiuchus from 30 November to 18 December, about 18 days (computed for 2026 with the official boundaries; the dates drift by a day per century). These are astronomical dates, not sign dates: someone born in that interval is a Sagittarius in the astrologers’ zodiac.
Has my zodiac sign changed?
No. Your sign is defined by the Sun’s position relative to the seasons, with Aries beginning at the spring equinox. That reference does not depend on the constellations and has not moved. The dates published in the “new zodiac” articles are the dates of the Sun passing in front of the constellations, which is a different thing altogether.
Why twelve signs but thirteen constellations?
Because signs are not constellations. The Babylonians cut the ecliptic into twelve equal sectors to track the lunar months and the seasons, then named them after the nearby constellations. The constellations themselves come in any size: Virgo takes 44° of the ecliptic, Scorpius 6.6°, and Ophiuchus’s foot crosses it.
Tropical or sidereal zodiac: which one is right?
Both are coherent conventions. The tropical zodiac, used in Western astrology, counts from the equinox. The sidereal zodiac, used in Indian astrology, counts from a reference star, about 24° away today. But both use twelve equal signs of 30°. Neither counts the constellations, and neither has thirteen signs.
Sources
- Dates of the Sun’s entry into each constellation (2026), extent of each constellation along the ecliptic, and dates of the vernal point’s passage from one constellation to the next: the author’s calculations with the official boundaries of the 88 constellations (International Astronomical Union, after Delporte, 1930), the Roman (1987) algorithm as implemented in Astropy, and Swiss Ephemeris for the Sun’s position. Lahiri ayanamsa on 24 October 2026: 24° 14′.
- NASA, “Constellations and the Calendar” (2016), and its message of 16 July 2020 (“No, we did not change the zodiac”), quoted by Time Out (21 July 2020) and NBC New York (27 September 2016).
- July evening sky shows 13th constellation in the Zodiac (University of Michigan, 11 January 2007): the 1930 boundaries and the Sun’s passage in front of Ophiuchus.
- Timeline of the thirteenth-sign proposals (Schmidt 1970, Berg 1995, Kunkle 2011): Ophiuchus (astrology), Wikipedia, with its references.
- Myth of Asclepius and the catasterism of Ophiuchus: Eratosthenes, Catasterismi, 6; Hyginus, Astronomica, II, 14. Ptolemy, Almagest, books VII-VIII (star catalogue) and Tetrabiblos, I, 10 (the signs begin at the equinox).
Keep reading
Now that your sign is safely yours, read what it really describes, and what it does not: the twelve zodiac signs of the course, then why your horoscope does not sound like you. The birth chart is the long answer to the question “who am I, astrologically?”.
The terms used here, ecliptic, vernal point, precession, tropical zodiac, are defined in the astrology dictionary.